Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Gun owners Please read this

So the latest gunman to shoot a bunch of totally innocent people, Devin P. Kelley by name, could have easily been stopped before he even started.* 
Sutherland Springs could have, and should have, been spared this nightmare quite easily.
The United States Air Force, which by the way, exists to protect us, KNEW this former member had issues that made him INELIGIBLE to buy a gun of any kind...and yet they failed to take the very simple step of notifying the database that is meant to keep track of people that are undesireable as gun owners.
If this is not proof positive that the vetting process for gun ownership is very flawed, then I cannot imagine what it will take. The murder of children and the elderly is not enough?
Then how about pregnant women, the disabled, war vets???
Look...I am NOT against guns in general. I enjoy target shooting. I don't hunt, but would if needed, and do not begrudge those who hunt for meat at all. I am a pretty good shot with a rifle and owned a .45 at one time before I had to sell it. I don't hate guns...I do not have ANY issue with everyday citizens owning hunting rifles and for home securiry, hand guns.
But there is NO legitimate reason to own assault weapons, none.
Now before you curse me, I grasp that many people are preparing for Armageddon and the probable necessity of having to rapidly shoot your former neighbors so that they don't steal your supplies, etc. This could indeed be the end of times, given that Donald Trump.is President and all. If there was ever a sign of the Apocalypse, I think that could be it.
But what if it comes instead as a self- fulfilling prophesy? What if actively and aggressively preparing for it, actually triggers it? 
Many of these crazed individuals doing these terrible things, die before we know their excuses for their actions. What if all this "prepping" has whipped them into their homicidal/suicidal frenzies?
What if, instead of investing in a very dark future, we invest in keeping it from ever happening? Armageddon is not an inevitability, people. Just because it is written down, does not make it a foregone conclusion.
At the risk of now also angering Christians, all holy books speak in metaphor, not facts. They warn about missteps and bad deeds. They were written by those that would control the actions of the masses by scaring them into good behavior. So okay, let's start behaving well instead of taking up arms against our brothers in preparation for killing them?
I know the Constitution guarantees the right to bear arms. So own a hand gun, hunting rifles, etc. But let's also stand up and say enough is enough to assault weapons, at least until they can stop these awful massacres, you must stop them. Please stop them
Just sayin
Dragonfly Davis
See article below


U.S.

Air Force Error Allowed Texas Gunman to Buy Weapons



The scene outside the First Baptist Church in Sutherland Springs, Tex., on Monday morning.TODD HEISLER/THE NEW YORK TIMES

SUTHERLAND SPRINGS, Tex. — A day after a gunman massacred parishioners in a small Texas church, the Air Force admitted on Monday that it had failed to enter the man’s domestic violence court-martial into a federal database that could have blocked him from buying the rifle he used to kill 26 people.
Under federal law, the conviction of the gunman, Devin P. Kelley, for domestic assault on his wife and toddler stepson — he had cracked the child’s skull — should have stopped Mr. Kelley from legally purchasing the military-style rifle and three other guns he acquired in the last four years.
“The Air Force has launched a review of how the service handled the criminal records of former Airman Devin P. Kelley following his 2012 domestic violence conviction,” the Air Force said in a statement.
The statement said Heather Wilson, the Air Force secretary, and Gen. David Goldfein, the Air Force chief of staff, had ordered the Air Force inspector general to “conduct a complete review of the Kelley case.”
The Air Force also said it was looking into whether other convictions had been improperly left unreported to the federal database for firearms background checks.


Devin Patrick Kelley, 26, opened fire in a church in rural Texas on Sunday, killing at least 26 people. He was pursued by residents and found dead in his car.

Mr. Kelley, who was dressed in all black and wore a skull-face mask, emerged from the church after he was done shooting, then was met by gunfire from a bystander outside, who hit Mr. Kelley in the leg and the torso. Mr. Kelley made it back to his car and led the bystander and another man in a dramatic chase that ended in a crash, with Mr. Kelley dead behind the wheel. He had shot himself in the head, officials said.
The shootings came a little over a month after 58 people were killed at a concert in Las Vegas, and were the latest in a string of mass killings in the United States. They led to another round of calls for more gun restrictions, though they were muted in comparison with previous tragedies, perhaps because gun-control advocates realized that a Republican-controlled Washington would not give in on gun rights.
Asked about the shooting during his trip to Asia, President Trump said Monday that the shooting was not related to regulations on gun ownership.
“I think that mental health is your problem here,” Mr. Trump said at a joint news conference with Prime Minister Shinzo Abe of Japan. “This was a very, based on preliminary reports, very deranged individual.”
On Tuesday, Mr. Trump was asked during a news conference in South Korea whether he would support “extreme vetting” of gun buyers, comparable to the vetting his administration has sought to impose on visitors from some predominantly Muslim countries.
“If you did what you’re suggesting, there would have been no difference three days ago,” the president replied, “and you might not have had that very brave person who happened to have a gun or a rifle in his truck go out and shoot him and hit him and neutralize him.”


Objects of mourning left by a traffic cone and barrier outside the First Baptist Church on Monday.TODD HEISLER/THE NEW YORK TIMES

“If he didn’t have a gun, instead of having 26 dead, you would have had hundreds more dead,” Mr. Trump said, reiterating an argument he has made after previous mass shootings — that more guns, not less, could be the answer.
Vice President Mike Pence said on Twitter that he and his wife would visit Sutherland Springs on Wednesday.




Senator Chris Murphy, a Connecticut Democrat, criticized Mr. Trump’s response on Monday, noting that the bystander did not fire at Mr. Kelley until the carnage inside the church was over.
“Let’s be clear — nobody ‘stopped’ this shooting,” he wrote on Twitter. “26 people, including little kids, are dead in one of our country’s worst mass killings.”




Former President Barack Obama, whose own calls for more gun regulations were stymied, said on Twitter, “May God also grant all of us the wisdom to ask what concrete steps we can take to reduce the violence and weaponry in our midst.”




The immediate question on Monday was how Mr. Kelley had been able to legally purchase his weapons. In his 2012 court-martial, Mr. Kelley admitted that he had repeatedly struck, kicked and choked his wife beginning just months into their marriage. He also said he had repeatedly hit his young stepson’s head with his hands, cracking his skull, said Don Christensen, a retired colonel who was the chief prosecutor for the Air Force.


Graphic | How They Got Their Guns Criminal histories and documented mental health problems did not prevent at least eight of the gunmen in 17 recent mass shootings from obtaining their weapons.ADDITIONAL WORK BY WILSON ANDREWS, SARAH ALMUKHTAR, ALICIA DESANTIS, GUILBERT GATES, JOSH KATZ, JULIE SHAVER AND KAREN YOURISH.

Federal law lists 11 criteria that would bar someone from buying a gun, including two that would seem to apply to Mr. Kelley: conviction of a crime punishable by more than a year in prison — assaulting his stepson, which carried a maximum sentence of five years — and conviction of a domestic violence misdemeanor.
The Department of Defense has reported only one domestic violence case to the federal database for gun purchase background checks, records show. It has reported 11,000 service members to the database, but almost all of them were because of dishonorable discharges, which prohibit gun purchases. Mr. Kelley, after serving 12 months in a Navy brig in California, received a “bad conduct” discharge, which is not by itself an automatic bar to gun purchases.
Elise Hasbrook, a spokeswoman for Academy Sports + Outdoors, which owns two San Antonio shops that each sold Mr. Kelley a gun in the last two years, said “both sales were approved by the National Instant Criminal Background Check System.” Mr. Kelley had bought two other guns since his court-martial, both in Colorado, the authorities said.
Gov. Greg Abbott of Texas told CNN that Mr. Kelley had been rejected when he applied for a license to carry a handgun in Texas. State officials did not specify why he was rejected, and a carrying license is not required to purchase a firearm from a gun shop so long as the buyer passes the federal background check.
“By all the facts that we seem to know, he was not supposed to have access to a gun, so how did this happen?” Mr. Abbott said.
The authorities in Comal County, which includes Mr. Kelley’s hometown, New Braunfels, also released records on Monday that showed Mr. Kelley had been the subject of an investigation for sexual assault and rape by force in 2013. The investigation ended without the filing of any charges.
On Monday, Sheriff Tackitt of Wilson County, where First Baptist is located, described Mr. Kelley’s horrific and methodical path through the church. After firing from outside the building, Mr. Kelley entered the church, and fired his weapon from side to side as he paced through the room, the sheriff said. Among those killed were members of three generations of the Holcombe family, including the guest preacher and his wife, and an 18-month-old girl named Noah.
“There was nothing anyone could do until he came out,” Sheriff Tackitt said.
After Mr. Kelley stepped out of the church, a man outside was waiting with his own rifle. They fired at each other, and Mr. Kelley was hit twice. He then drove off in his car.
The bystander, who identified himself Monday night as Stephen Willeford, flagged down a nearby driver, Johnnie Langendorff, and they gave chase, at speeds upward of 90 miles an hour, Mr. Langendorff said. Mr. Kelley contacted his father from his cellphone during the chase to tell him that he had been shot, according to law enforcement officials, telling his father that he “didn’t think he was going to make it.” He soon crashed and was found dead behind the wheel with three gunshot wounds, including his own shot to his head.
Sheriff Tackitt called Mr. Willeford a “hero.”
In an interview with a local television station, Mr. Willeford said his daughter had heard gunshots from the church and alerted him. He retrieved his rifle and went to the church.
Mr. Willeford grew emotional as he spoke about what he saw and heard.
“Every time I heard a shot I knew that probably represented a life,” he said. “I was scared to death, I was. I was scared for me and I was scared for every one of them. And I was scared for my own family that lived less than a block away.”
“I’m no hero, I am not,” he said. “I think my God, my Lord protected me and gave me the skills to do what needed to be done.”
“I just wish I could have gotten there faster,” he said.

David Montgomery reported from Sutherland Springs, and Richard A. Oppel Jr. and Jose A. DelReal from New York. Reporting was contributed by Manny Fernandez from Houston; Alan Blinder from New Braunfels, Tex.; Susan Anasagasti from Sutherland Springs; Adam Goldman from Washington; and Mark Landler from Seoul, South Korea. Jack Begg and Susan C. Beachy contributed research.


ADVERTISEMENT





YOU HAVE 9 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH


Enjoy journalism worthy of 122 Pulitzers. More than any other news organization.

Monday, November 6, 2017

Time to choose...the NRA or innocent victims

OMFG
Trump says this latest mass shooting "isn't a gun issue, It's a mental health issue"

Well , duh, you stupid NRA puppet.
But guess what?? His mental health wouldn't be much of an issue if he hadn't had a freaking assault rifle. Beating 26 people to death would have been much more difficult to do.
I'm sorry if I hurt any feelings here....no, wait, not sorry, but you Constitution hugging, Armageddon planning, "I have my rights",
gun obsessed folks need to unclench.
Innocent people..like 5 and 72 year olds, are being slaughtered..BY FREAKING GUNS held by nutcakes. You can spout that moronic verse, fed to you by the NRA, " guns don't kill people, people kill people" all day long, but.until access to at the least, assault weapons is stopped..every innocent life snuffed out by one is now, and forever more, on YOUR HEADS, because like women who don't report rapists, you could easily put a stop to it, and you instead sit self-righteously by and let it happen.
Let's start blaming the real culprits here and effect some change.

Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Let light come to be...

or "Let there be light", or however you've heard it, it's all the same thing. After Jehovah the God created the light (Jesus), everything came afterwards. Now, what if, almost naturally, the first thing that the spiritual light would create, since HE was created as the great architect of the universe WAS, in fact, stars. Makes total sense, doesn't it? Now, stars come in ALL sizes. Ours, for instance is a pretty small guy for an active sun. Betelguise (pronounced here as Beetlejuice) is WAY bigger, and there is another sun that dwarfs IT, so. We don't have a clue how long God's days and nights are. They could last literally billions of years, down to 24 hours at any given time, it's not for us to know, but assume that as His divine architect is creating stars for the light, it takes billions of years for them to become what they all eventually do become. Big balls of gas, AND, they also have two other things in common. They all eventually burn out due to their hydrogen molecules turning into iron, instantaneously causing the star to explode; AND the fact that everything else IN the universe is made partly of stardust, the building blocks of life, plus some. SO, the first thing to exist beyond the Father and the Son HAS to be light, otherwise nothing else could get made. So they wait, and commune until some stars finally explode and widen the universe to the point where gravity takes things over and causes planets, moons, meteors, asteroid belts to come into being, and THEN, the dust further settles where it is designed to settle and starts the process of creating things with the Carpenter's help. So we truly are, science has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that we are comprised of stardust molecules, as is everything. So yeah! We agree on something at last. They just aren't quite ready to admit that someone intelligent had anything to do with how it happened. First was the "Big Bang Theory" that first there was nothing, then in an instant, everything out there, THEN there is "String theory" about multiple universes , and now ladies and germs, there is "M" theory, where two brains out there on occasion collide and made all of this.
My question is, with ALL that is happening in the world right now, WHY MUST we find the answer before we need to? It's NOT like anything is going to change any time soon, and we could sure use the trillions of dollars spent on this research, most of which is done in rooms on grease boards, NOW for stuff that is in dire need NOW, not in a billion years from now. I would LOVE to know how the universe works, but quite frankly, I don't think we are equipped to grasp the answer to that just yet. We would go insane if we really knew what was going on out there, we are yet as children. If it was time, we'd have been shown by now, right? Can we please just grasp what we DO know first, please, before foraying out there to find stuff we cannot comprehend yet? I want to know, but I have learned, as a grown up, the concept of delayed gratification and can wait until I'm supposed to see the bigger picture, and there is a LOT of it to study before running out for a LONG time. So learn some things about the known universe first before we literally "put our foot into it" and come to find out that there are greater things in heaven and on earth than we can imagine, already. Whadda ya say, huh?And in the meantime, let's talk about taking care of some things here, OR we would absolutely NOT be around long enough to find out the big surprise, and we want to be there don't we? I'm not saying to curtail the space programs entirely, but enough that we can balance the budget, little things like that and THEN, when we can afford to do all of this 'traveling", I'm  on board, let's get things rolling along and find stuff out, okay? Otherwise, we're just going to be another dead moon if someone eventually finds us. What if they came today? I'd be embarrassed for how little we know about the "big room" we running around in, when we don't really know everything that's going in here. Let's explore our house before the neighborhood, what do you say??
Just saying,
Dragonfly Davis

Thursday, April 26, 2012

What if...

a person's whole being perched on those two words, what if? What if it gets better tomorrow, what if I help someone next week that wouldn't otherwise get help, what if I'm going to die in a month anyway and so just be patient? It's like Schrodinger's cat*.
You don't get to know what if unless you open the box, and if you open the box, you may find that you're already gone and this is all just a dream of some sort that you've never experienced. Maybe everything is just a dream that someone, somewhere is dreaming and everything we know to BE is part of that dream? Could that being be God? Are we all part of His dream for a universe and everything that would be in it? What if every single particle IN that dream made a difference in it? I saw a program, a science program, that proved that we are indeed formed from dust, stardust, to be exact. Every single thing in the universe is composed of the inner workings of stardust, from a star somewhere that died and spread itself out into the cosmos. It's positively Biblical in proportion when you think about it.
When the first star was created (let light come to be), it came and it grew over time and when it became old enough, it exploded into the space created and became EVERYTHING.
Remember that God's, and the universe's time, are NOT the same as OUR time. Who says science and religion can't get along? They're basically saying most of the same things, but like the Hatfield's and the McCoys, the Montague's and the Capulet's, neither side wants to admit they are in agreement about a LOT of stuff. There is NOTHING that I saw in "How the Universe was made" that dissuaded me from believing that an intelligence did it, nothing. Sorry space cowboys, you're steadily proving the Bible to be true little by little, whether you know your cat is dead or not.
As for MY cat, it's still in the damn box, and I'm scared to open it up. I want SO badly to be gone from all this pain, discomfort, frustration, loneliness and heartache, but then, what if...  Those have GOT to be the two most diabolical words ever stuck together, and bah humbug to the bugger that did it. A pox on your big toe.
This is SO freaking hard sometimes, isn't it?
Just sayin' and trying to explain it all,
Dragonfly Davis
No extra charge for the definition below, I think everyone should read it, it's a poser, to say the least, and makes lesser stickers somewhat less sticky sometimes.
 
*Schrodinger's cat
Schrödinger's cat is a famous illustration of the principle in quantum theory of superposition, proposed by Erwin Schrödinger in 1935. Schrödinger's cat serves to demonstrate the apparent conflict between what quantum theory tells us is true about the nature and behavior of matter on the microscopic level and what we observe to be true about the nature and behavior of matter on the macroscopic level -- everything visible to the unaided human eye.
Here's Schrödinger's (theoretical) experiment: We place a living cat into a steel chamber, along with a device containing a vial of hydrocyanic acid. There is, in the chamber, a very small amount of hydrocyanic acid, a radioactive substance. If even a single atom of the substance decays during the test period, a relay mechanism will trip a hammer, which will, in turn, break the vial and kill the cat.
The observer cannot know whether or not an atom of the substance has decayed, and consequently, cannot know whether the vial has been broken, the hydrocyanic acid released, and the cat killed. Since we cannot know, according to quantum law, the cat is both dead and alive, in what is called a superposition of states. It is only when we break open the box and learn the condition of the cat that the superposition is lost, and the cat becomes one or the other (dead or alive). This situation is sometimes called quantum indeterminacy or the observer's paradox: the observation or measurement itself affects an outcome, so that the outcome as such does not exist unless the measurement is made. (That is, there is no single outcome unless it is observed.)

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Two and a half terminal men...

Is what it should have been called when Ashton came in to save it. Mr. Kutcher is NOT the reason the show is failing. It was on it's last legs when the pathetic Charlie Sheen finally blew a gasket. Granted, the show was, in large part, pretty much a thinly veiled view into Mr. Sheen's real life, but the rest of it was at least still tolerable, but sinking already. The real reason the show is tanking is the terrible writing. It's always been mostly dialogue full of double meanings and barely acceptable language, but Chuck Lorre has obviously lost all interest in this particular horse in his stable of shows. It's just everyone is now just walking about, saying the most prurient things they can think to say. The only character that has any decent dialogue is Walden, and he can't do it all alone, he has to have SOMEONE to play off of.  It's pure and simple, the show has just run out of ideas. Even if Charlie were still there, this would be the final hours of the thing. It wasn't much more than a one trick pony to begin with, but now everyone on the show is a caricature of themselves and it should be brought to an end, it's suffered enough. If anyone could have saved it, it was Ashton, but the writers just aren't interested any more, so let it die in peace, it's just embarrassing itself now, and it's the fault of the writers and producers, NOT the actors, most of which are probably hanging on so tightly because their employment elsewhere is in peril, except for Mr. Kutcher, which is a shame, because there are some good actors on the show, just not being used well, just used. Say goodbye, please.
Just sayin',
Dragonfly Davis

Sunday, April 15, 2012

Creation and Evolution, just a thought...

This ongoing battle about whether we're a product of creation or evolution needs to stop, and I think that maybe semantics may be the reason that it rages on. Give this a few minutes thought, if you would.
Say we were created, bam, we're here. Nowhere in the Bible does it say exactly HOW long it took for things to "mature" into what they are now. One of God's days could be millions of ours, right? SO, that could mean that we took a LONG time to become what we are, couldn't it? And as far as the term "evolve", it could just as easily be called "adapting", couldn't it? We have always adapted to whatever we were presented with. You can see that in the different races around the globe, how they adapted to the weather and conditions in their areas. Adaptation does NOT mean we were not created, does it? It doesn't have to. It's like the automobile. The first cars were made of what was possible at that time, right? And as the years have gone by, the cars have adapted to the changing conditions, the wants of the consumers, the laws of the land, etc., but that doesn't negate that they were created in their original form, does it? No. Everything that was created at the start is not still around. Some things were killed off and some could not make the necessary changes to survive in their current circumstances...survival of the fittest...but again, that does NOT negate the possibility of creation. We've changed just in the past few hundred years, since medicine and such have improved, and things like hormones are found in our food. There are 6 year old children hitting puberty now because of all the hormones in some foods, and there are people living to be 100+ due to the great medicines available now, and that can be considered "evolving", because we are, more correctly, adapting to our world as we go along, as we always have. So, if you really think about it, one concept does NOT negate the other. They can live quite nicely together if the powers that be would just be more flexible about things. I could name probably 20 things that have changed about us physically since ancient times, and that is due mostly to necessity and availability of different things, but it sure doesn't mean we weren't created by something greater than ourselves billions of OUR years ago. Just try to wrap your head around the time frame issue, and it's very clear. And we, and everything else in the world, are SO complex that there is no way it just, in a totally random way,  Happened to all fall into place. Just look at what's inside an atom and you can see that plain and simple, and if that doesn't do it for you, look at everything just in the known universe. None of this was an accident, not possible.
So all you have to do is agree that we were created, and have been adapting to our situations ever since, and we have the whole thing nicely covered, and all these people that live on government grants trying to prove one or the other will have to get real jobs. They keep the battle going because it's so simple to keep people divided on any big issue. It's our nature to take sides on things, but in this instance, I think it's time we were all on the same side. We have much more pressing issues to be fussing with. This seems to me to be a no-brainer.
Just sayin'
Dragonfly Davis

Thursday, April 5, 2012

Dear Chuck Lorre...

I read your vanity card recently where it said " I am so very tired". Well, that has become pretty obvious lately. Listen, you have, and have had, many shows that have lots of dialogue that has double meanings, inuendo and other forms of wordplay that were mostly thinly veiled sexual remarks, and most were okay, some even very cute, BUT...Lately, on TAAHM, you have seriously crossed the line. I realize that you don't write all these shows or maybe even check the content before they are done, but you need to start watching. TAAHM is failing now, and it isn't because of Ashton, HE is the only reason I look in still, the only redeeming quality left on the show. "Men" has always been a pretty much one trick pony and sex talk has always been part of it because it was about a "playboy and an over-sexed and under-achieving sad sack", so. BUT when two lines cannot be exchanged without SOMETHING sexual being said, that's just too much, and it's not even just the quantity of sexual material, it's the quality, or total lack of, that is disturbing me. I am not a prude by most standards, but when a joke HAS to be made, not just once, but twice about the "fact" that Allan can, well, with the help of extreme flexibility, "toot his own horn" as it were, well, that is just crossing a very gross line. Yes, I know it's a possible thing, a lot of people know that, but does it have to find itself on one of your shows? I don't think so. I didn't think Mr. Cryer could sink much lower, but it seems I was wrong. I realize his character is very flawed, but there is a point after which he's not just flawed, but sick. It would seem that everyone on the show has become a caricature of themselves, even the previously "normal" ones. Walden seems to be the only one still within the realm of normalcy, sexually speaking, but even he is slipping. I realize that in the day of Mr. Sheen, your main demographic was 18-38 year old males, and toilet and sexual humor was all that was expected, but now that you have someone NOT basically portraying themselves and there is more reason to tune in, there are those of us that could use some of the adult, but not crude, humor that we all know you're capable of. What do you say, Chuck? I miss your wit, I really do. While you're at it, can you get Mike and Molly back out of the sex sewer? That was a cute little show, and you're ruining IT little by little, too. Please stop, I'm not the only one that feels this way. We love your stuff when it's closer to our "pay grade", okay? Thanks for listening. 
A longtime fan.
Just sayin'
Dragonfly Davis